ADC crisis: Kwankwasiyya demand NJC to wade into conflicting rulings, INEC Chair resignation 

ADC crisis: Kwankwasiyya demand NJC to wade into conflicting rulings, INEC Chair resignation 
NJC okays 4 new Supreme Court Justices, sets up panel to probe 8 Judges

By Bashir Bello

KANO — The Kwankwassiya movement has called on the National Judicial Council, NJC to wade in to address conflicting court rulings and on the other hand demanded the immediate resignation of the Chairman of Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, Joash Amupitan for decision not to recognize the African Democratic Congress, ADC National Chairman, David Mark and its Secretary, Rauf Aregbesola.

The movement who made the call through it spokesperson, Habib Mohammed, cried foul over what they described as convergence of institutional failures which poses a grave threat to the credibility of future elections, particularly as Nigeria approaches the 2027 general elections.

According to the statement, “the Kwankwasiyya Movement expresses concern over the unfolding threats to Nigerias democracy arising from a combination of judicial inconsistencies and the increasingly questionable conduct of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) under its current leadership.

“Recent developments surrounding the leadership crisis within the African Democratic Congress (ADC), and the consequential decision by INEC to suspend recognition of any faction pending judicial determination, have once again exposed the fragile and troubling state of Nigerias democratic institutions. While INEC may claim compliance with court orders, the broader circumstances reveal a dangerous pattern where conflicting judicial pronouncements and administrative decisions combine to paralyze political parties and weaken opposition platforms.

“This situation is not isolated. Similar crises have plagued the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Labour Party (LP), and New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), where judicial interventions have often been contradictory and procedurally questionable, triggering prolonged leadership disputes and institutional uncertainty. The cumulative effect is the systematic erosion of internal party democracy and the shrinking of the political space necessary for a healthy, competitive system.

“At the heart of this crisis is the growing disregard for established legal principles, including the doctrine of Stare Decisis, and the troubling trend of courts of coordinate jurisdiction issuing conflicting orders on the same matters. These developments not only undermine the credibility of the judiciary but also create an environment where electoral management becomes susceptible to manipulation, discretion, and selective compliance. Rather than acting as a stabilizing force in this chaotic environment, the leadership of INEC has, unfortunately, reinforced public distrust through actions that raise serious concerns about neutrality, consistency, and commitment to democratic values.

“Also alarming is the introduction of a voter revalidation exercise just months before critical elections an action that is not only ill-timed but widely perceived as a deliberate and calculated attempt to disenfranchise millions of eligible Nigerian voters. At a time when confidence in the electoral system is already fragile, such a policy introduces confusion, imposes unnecessary administrative hurdles, and threatens to exclude law-abiding citizens from exercising their fundamental right to vote. This revalidation exercise bears all the hallmarks of a systemic trap capable of suppressing voter turnout, distorting electoral participation, and disproportionately affecting opposition-leaning populations. It represents not reform, but regression a direct assault on democratic inclusion.

“Taken together, these developments point to a dangerous trajectory: a weakened judiciary marked by inconsistency, political parties crippled by legal uncertainty, and an electoral body whose actions increasingly inspire doubt rather than confidence. This convergence of institutional failures poses a grave threat to the credibility of future elections, particularly as Nigeria approaches the 2027 general elections.

“Let it be stated clearly: democracy cannot survive where political parties are incapacitated by judicial confusion and where the electoral umpire is perceived to be complicit whether by action or omission in the suppression of voters and the distortion of political competition.

“The Kwankwasiyya Movement therefore states, without hesitation, that the Chairman of INEC has lost the moral authority, public trust, and institutional credibility required to continue in office. His continued stay represents a direct risk to democratic stability and national unity.

“We therefore demand: The immediate resignation of the INEC Chairman. The urgent suspension of the voter revalidation exercise. Similarly, a greater judicial discipline and intervention by the National Judicial Council (NJC) to address conflicting rulings. A recommitment by all institutions to the principles of fairness, consistency, and constitutional order.

“We also call on political actors to desist from weaponizing the judiciary for partisan advantage, and on civil society and the international community to remain vigilant in defending Nigerias democratic space.

“Nigeria’s future depends on strong institutions, credible processes, and the protection of the peoples right to freely choose their leaders. These must not be compromised. The will of the people must prevail,” the statement however reads.

The post ADC crisis: Kwankwasiyya demand NJC to wade into conflicting rulings, INEC Chair resignation  appeared first on Vanguard News.